Mazda MX-5 2000 vs Lexus SC 2001

 
Mazda MX-5
2000 - 2005
Lexus SC
2001 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol4.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 146 HP286 HP
Torque: 168 NM419 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds6.4 seconds
Lexus SC is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda MX-5 engine produces 140 HP less power than Lexus SC, whereas torque is 251 NM less than Lexus SC. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.512.0
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda MX-5 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus SC, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
660 km on highway830 km on highway
Lexus SC gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m4.52 m
Width: 1.68 m1.82 m
Height: 1.22 m1.37 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 55 cm shorter than the Lexus SC, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 15 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 145 litres135 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
145 litres450 litres
Turning diameter: 9.7 metersno data
Gross weight: 1`280 kg2`110 kg
Net weight:1`065 kg1`815 kg
Load capacity:215 kg295 kg
Mazda MX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Lexus SC. Therefore, Lexus SC is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 500012 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Lexus SC has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv