Mazda MX-5 2015 vs BMW 2 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Mazda MX-5 engine produces 30 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 200 NM less than BMW 2 series. Despite less power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 2 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MX-5 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-5 could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 2 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW 2 series version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Used also on BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda MX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda MX-5 2015 2.0 engine BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.24 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 52 cm shorter than the BMW 2 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 335 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 150 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1.5 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`260 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |