Mazda MX-5 2006 vs Opel Astra 2010

 
Mazda MX-5
2006 - 2009
Opel Astra
2010 - 2012
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 160 HP116 HP
Torque: 188 NM155 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds11.7 seconds
Mazda MX-5 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda MX-5 engine produces 44 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda MX-5 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-5 could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-5 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1090 km on highway
580 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years17 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Used also on Opel Mokka
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Mazda MX-5 2006 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.42 m
Width: 1.72 m1.81 m
Height: 1.26 m1.51 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 42 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 25 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 150 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1235 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-5 has 220 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3551`870
Safety: no datano data
Quality:Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54003600
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Astra has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv