Mazda MX-5 2006 vs Opel Astra 2007

 
Mazda MX-5
2006 - 2009
Opel Astra
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.9 Diesel
Petrol engines (Mazda MX-5) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Astra) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 126 HP150 HP
Torque: 167 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds10 seconds
Mazda MX-5 engine produces 24 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 153 NM less than Opel Astra. Despite less power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.36.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda MX-5 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-5 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-5 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway1000 km on highway
600 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years6 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Opel Astra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda MX-5 2006 1.8 engine: The engine often has unstable idling speeds and problems with the thermostat.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.48 m
Width: 1.72 m1.75 m
Height: 1.26 m1.41 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 48 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 15 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 150 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data440 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-5 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3551`983
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda MX-5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda MX-5, so Mazda MX-5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 70003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Opel Astra has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv