Mazda MX-5 2006 vs Opel Astra 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda MX-5 engine produces 11 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-5 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda MX-5 2006 1.8 engine: The engine often has unstable idling speeds and problems with the thermostat. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 48 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 440 litres | |
|
Opel Astra has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda MX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda MX-5, so Mazda MX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Opel Astra has
| |