Mazda MX-5 2009 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 465 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-5 engine produces 200 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 277 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MX-5 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda MX-5 2009 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 18 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Audi TT has
| |