Mazda MX-5 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017

 
Mazda MX-5
2009 - 2013
Volkswagen Polo
2017 -
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 126 HP272 HP
Torque: 167 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds4.1 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda MX-5 engine produces 146 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 233 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres40 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda MX-5 2009 1.8 engine: The engine often has unstable idling speeds and problems with the thermostat.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.05 m
Width: 1.72 m1.94 m
Height: 1.26 m1.37 m
Mazda MX-5 is 67 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 150 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`375no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): no data8400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv