Mazda MX-5 2013 vs Opel Corsa 2011
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Opel Corsa is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-5 engine produces 32 HP less power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Opel Corsa. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.3 | |
|
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-5 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Corsa) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Corsa can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Corsa version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda MX-5 2013 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is larger, but lower. Mazda MX-5 is 2 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Opel Corsa has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda MX-5 has 135 litres less trunk space than the Opel Corsa. This could mean that the Mazda MX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`703 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda MX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda MX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Opel Corsa has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda MX-5, so Opel Corsa quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |