Mazda MX-5 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012

 
Mazda MX-5
2013 - 2015
Honda CR-V
2012 - 2015
Body: CabrioCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 160 HP150 HP
Torque: 188 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds12.8 seconds
Mazda MX-5 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda MX-5 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 2 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.7
Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-5 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway920 km on highway
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years19 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Used also on Honda Accord
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Mazda MX-5 2013 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors. Many Honda owners are annoyed ...  More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m4.57 m
Width: 1.72 m1.82 m
Height: 1.26 m1.69 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 55 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 43 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 150 litres589 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1669 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-5 has 439 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3752`100
Safety:
Mazda MX-5 is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Honda CR-V has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data11 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher children safety
Honda CR-V has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv