Mazda MX-5 2013 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 126 HP | 272 HP | |
Torque: | 167 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 4.1 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-5 engine produces 146 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 233 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Mazda MX-5 2013 1.8 engine: The engine often has unstable idling speeds and problems with the thermostat. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.26 m | 1.37 m | |
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |