Mazda MX-5 1998 vs Mercedes SLK 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MX-5
1998 - 2005
Mercedes SLK
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.82.0 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 110 - 172 HP136 - 193 HP
Torque: 134 - 209 NM190 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 9.7 seconds7.3 - 9.7 seconds
In general, Mercedes SLK are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda MX-5. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.1 - 9.59.1 - 9.5
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m4.00 m
Width: 1.68 m1.72 m
Height: 1.22 m1.29 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 145 litres145 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
145 litres348 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLK.
Gross weight: ~ 1`267 kg~ 1`548 kg
Net weight:~ 1`058 kg~ 1`213 kg
Load capacity:~ 209 kg~ 335 kg
Mazda MX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 60 procentiem less than Mercedes SLK. Therefore, Mercedes SLK is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 50003400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mercedes SLK has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv