Mazda MX-5 1998 vs Audi TT 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MX-5
1998 - 2005
Audi TT
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda MX-5 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.81.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 110 - 172 HP150 - 250 HP
Torque: 134 - 209 NM210 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 9.7 seconds6.4 - 8.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.1 - 9.58.2 - 11.0
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m4.04 m
Width: 1.68 m1.76 m
Height: 1.22 m1.35 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 7 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 145 litres220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
145 litresno data
Audi TT has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-5 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mazda MX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`267~ 1`737
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 68005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv