Mazda MX-5 1998 vs Audi TT 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda MX-5 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 172 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 134 - 209 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 9.7 seconds | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 9.5 | 8.2 - 11.0 | |
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.98 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.22 m | 1.35 m | |
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 7 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 220 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
145 litres | no data | |
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mazda MX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`737 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Audi TT has
| |