Mazda MX-5 2005 vs Audi A3 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MX-5
2005 - 2009
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mazda MX-5 is available with rear wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol)1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi A3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 126 - 167 HP102 - 200 HP
Torque: 167 - 190 NM148 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 9.6 seconds7.3 - 12.5 seconds
In general, Mazda MX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi A3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.3 - 8.85.1 - 10.3
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.24 m
Width: 1.72 m1.76 m
Height: 1.26 m1.42 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 24 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 150 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data674 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-5 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`365 kg~ 1`930 kg
Net weight:~ 1`082 kg~ 1`429 kg
Load capacity:~ 283 kg~ 501 kg
Mazda MX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 77 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 62006400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi A3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv