Mazda MX-5 2008 vs Audi A3 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mazda MX-5 is available with rear wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 126 - 161 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 167 - 188 NM | 148 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | 7.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.0 | 5.1 - 10.3 | |
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.26 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda MX-5 is 1 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 17 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 674 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda MX-5 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda MX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`375 | ~ 1`930 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |