Mazda MX-5 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda MX-5 is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 160 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 188 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 9.9 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.0 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 35 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 185 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`375 kg | ~ 1`978 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`158 kg | ~ 1`499 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 217 kg | ~ 479 kg | |
| Mazda MX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Volvo V40. Therefore, Volvo V40 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |