Mazda MX-5 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda MX-5 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 160 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 188 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 9.9 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.0 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 54 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 43 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 439 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`375 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda MX-5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |