Mazda MPV 1990 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

 
Mazda MPV
1990 - 1999
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 154 HP174 HP
Torque: 230 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.8 seconds
Mazda MPV engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.711.7
Fuel tank capacity: 74 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Sharan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MPV) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.62 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.69 m1.73 m
Mazda MPV is 16 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 4 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 335 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 335 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1060 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3562`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Sharan has
    • more power
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv