Mazda MPV 1990 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mazda MPV engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 12.7 | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Galaxy) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MPV) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mazda MPV is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 266 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 335 litres | 266 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1060 litres | 2610 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda MPV has more luggage space (by 69 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 1550 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`356 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`831 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 655 kg | |
| Mazda MPV load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |