Mazda MPV 2007 vs Volvo V60 2016
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
| Mazda MPV engine produces 204 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 267 NM less than Volvo V60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 67 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda Tribute | Used also on Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MPV might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda MPV 2007 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time. In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda MPV is 24 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MPV is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |