Mazda MPV 2007 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda MPV
2007 - 2016
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 163 HP150 HP
Torque: 203 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.7 seconds
Mazda MPV engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 177 NM less than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data4.8
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres51 litres

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda TributeInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda CX-7
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MPV might be a better choice in this respect.
Mazda MPV 2007 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.46 m
Width: 1.85 m1.80 m
Height: 1.69 m1.45 m
Mazda MPV is larger.
Mazda MPV is 41 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 24 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: no data364 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`930
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data7000
Pros and Cons: Mazda MPV has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv