Mazda MPV 1999 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Mazda MPV
1999 - 2002
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 122 HP115 HP
Torque: 175 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 seconds14.7 seconds
Mazda MPV is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda MPV engine produces 7 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 135 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.111.2
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda MPV consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway780 km on highway
Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.74 m1.73 m
Mazda MPV is larger.
Mazda MPV is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 1 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 294 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 294 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Mazda MPV can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2302`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 10002200
Pros and Cons: Mazda MPV has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv