Mazda MPV 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda MPV) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chrysler Voyager) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 8 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 87 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Despite the higher power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mazda MPV is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |