Mazda MPV 1999 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 34 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 13.3 | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is smaller. Mazda MPV is 32 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 4880 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 3280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Mazda MPV can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |