Mazda MPV 1999 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 151 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 229 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 29 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.4 | |
Mazda MPV consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Mazda MPV is smaller. Mazda MPV is 32 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 670 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 670 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Mazda MPV can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`525 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |