Mazda MPV 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Picnic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is larger. Mazda MPV is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 6 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1840 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |