Mazda MPV 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 9 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 5 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is larger. Mazda MPV is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2745 litres | 952 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda MPV (by 1793 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |