Mazda MPV 2003 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda MPV engine produces 13 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MPV consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MPV consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda MPV is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MPV is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2745 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`395 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |