Mazda MPV 2003 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 4 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MPV consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Mazda MPV and Chrysler Voyager are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2745 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`395 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |