Mazda MPV 2007 vs Volvo V60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MPV
2007 - 2016
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Body: Minivan / MPVEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Mazda MPV is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V60 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda MPV is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.3 (petrol)1.5 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V60 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 163 HP115 - 367 HP
Torque: 203 NM220 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds4.8 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data3.8 - 10.2
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.63 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.69 m1.48 m
Mazda MPV is 24 cm longer than the Volvo V60, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MPV is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Turning diameter: no data13.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 2`168
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data13 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda MPV has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
Volvo V60 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv