Mazda MPV 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Mazda MPV is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda MPV is available with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 141 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 310 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 13.2 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.1 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Mazda MPV petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mazda MPV equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is larger. Mazda MPV is 19 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2745 litres | 952 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda MPV has 233 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mazda MPV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda MPV (by 1793 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`333 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |