Mazda MPV 2003 vs Kia Carnival 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mazda MPV is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Kia Carnival has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 2.5 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 141 HP | 130 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 195 - 310 NM | 224 - 324 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 13.2 seconds | 13.8 - 16.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.1 | 8.2 - 12.4 | |
Mazda MPV petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Carnival. On average, Mazda MPV equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Mazda MPV is smaller, but higher. Mazda MPV is 13 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MPV is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 302 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2745 litres | 3320 litres | |
Mazda MPV has 8 litres less trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 575 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 1.6 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Mazda MPV can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`333 | ~ 2`590 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |