Mazda Demio 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Mazda Demio engine produces 16 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is larger. Mazda Demio is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Demio is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 323 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda Demio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda Demio, so Mazda Demio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
| |