Mazda Demio 2003 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mazda Demio engine produces 1 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda Demio is 23 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 117 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 736 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |