Mazda Demio 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Mazda Demio engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mazda Demio is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 175 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 538 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Demio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |