Mazda Demio 2003 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Mazda Demio engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is smaller, but higher. Mazda Demio is 44 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Demio has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 202 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |