Mazda Demio 2003 vs Mazda 2 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Mazda Demio engine produces 33 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Demio and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 62 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 254 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Demio has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |