Mazda Demio 2000 vs Peugeot 206 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
Mazda Demio and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, but Mazda Demio torque is 4 NM less than Peugeot 206. Mazda Demio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.9 | |
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Demio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Demio could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Demio engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Mazda Demio engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.82 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.43 m | |
Mazda Demio and Peugeot 206 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1130 litres | |
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 85 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 168 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`450 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Mazda Demio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mazda Demio, so Mazda Demio quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |