Mazda Demio 2000 vs Hyundai Matrix 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda Demio engine produces 28 HP less power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Hyundai Matrix. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Matrix might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is smaller. Mazda Demio is 20 cm shorter than the Hyundai Matrix, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | no data | |
| Mazda Demio has 20 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda Demio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Matrix has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda Demio, so Mazda Demio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |