Mazda Demio 1997 vs Peugeot 206 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Demio engine produces 12 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Mazda Demio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda Demio consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Demio could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Demio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Demio engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 121 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda Demio engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda Demio and Peugeot 206 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 85 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 168 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda Demio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mazda Demio, so Mazda Demio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |