Mazda Demio 2003 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda Demio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 - 113 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 140 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is smaller, but higher. Mazda Demio is 44 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Mazda Demio has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 202 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |