Mazda Demio 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda Demio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Colt has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Colt is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 - 113 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 140 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mazda Demio is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 110 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 538 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`482 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |