Mazda Demio 1997 vs Nissan Note 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 - 75 HP | 88 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 116 NM | 128 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 16.1 seconds | 10.7 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 4.2 - 6.8 | |
|
Mazda Demio petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is smaller. Mazda Demio is 28 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1332 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Demio has 50 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 34 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 1.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`475 | ~ 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Nissan Note has
| |