Mazda Demio 1997 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 - 75 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 116 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 16.1 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Mazda Demio petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is smaller. Mazda Demio is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Demio has 63 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 254 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 2, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`475 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |