Mazda Demio 1997 vs Kia RIO 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 - 75 HP | 97 - 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 116 NM | 125 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 16.1 seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 4.7 - 7.2 | |
|
Mazda Demio petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is smaller, but higher. Mazda Demio is 17 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 272 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1107 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Demio has 58 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. The Kia RIO may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 191 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia RIO, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`475 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Kia RIO has
| |