Mazda Demio 1997 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 1.8 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 63 - 75 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
Torque: | 103 - 116 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 16.1 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
Mazda Demio petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.82 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.41 m | |
Mazda Demio is smaller, but higher. Mazda Demio is 91 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 479 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | no data | |
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Mazda Demio has 149 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 1.2 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`475 | ~ 1`903 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Kia Optima has
| |