Mazda Demio 1997 vs Kia Optima 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda Demio
1997 - 2003
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 1.51.8 - 2.7

Performance

Power: 63 - 75 HP134 - 181 HP
Torque: 103 - 116 NM169 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 - 16.1 seconds8.5 - 10.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 7.99.1 - 10.4
Mazda Demio petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m4.73 m
Width: 1.67 m1.82 m
Height: 1.54 m1.41 m
Mazda Demio is smaller, but higher.
Mazda Demio is 91 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres479 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1298 litresno data
Kia Optima has more luggage space.
Mazda Demio has 149 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima.
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Demio is 1.2 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Mazda Demio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`475~ 1`903
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda Demio has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Kia Optima has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv