Mazda CX-9 2013 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 21 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 14 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.2 | |
| Mazda CX-9 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 1 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2410 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Dodge Durango has more luggage space (by 3 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 442 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 32 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Durango has
| |