Mazda CX-9 2013 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi Q7, but torque is 7 NM more than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 12.1 | |
| Mazda CX-9 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 1 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2035 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 817 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q7 has
| |