Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Mazda CX-7 2011

 
Mazda CX-9
2016 -
Mazda CX-7
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 231 HP163 HP
Torque: 420 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.3 seconds
Mazda CX-9 engine produces 68 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Mazda CX-7.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.4
Mazda CX-9 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 74 litres69 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway910 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Mazda CX-9 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive.

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.68 m
Width: 1.97 m1.87 m
Height: 1.75 m1.65 m
Mazda CX-9 is larger.
Mazda CX-9 is 40 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 10 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 407 litres455 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 407 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2017 litres774 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1243 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`6402`099
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data6200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Mazda CX-7 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv