Mazda CX-9 2016 vs BMW X4 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 382 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 151 HP less power than BMW X4, whereas torque is 75 NM less than BMW X4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.2 | |
| Mazda CX-9 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 4 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2019 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X4 2019 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 32 cm longer than the BMW X4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 1430 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 587 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`640 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 37 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
BMW X4 has
| |