Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Mazda CX-7 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 68 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Mazda CX-7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.4 | |
| Mazda CX-9 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 40 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 774 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`570 | 2`099 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |